Well that's a strange way to put it. I would think that "parallel processing" is defined by the "side that doesn't think it exists" in very specific detail that is easily understood and defined and tested. That's how they don't think it exists, they've tested and searched and have never seen the evidence to support that definition.
8:57 PM
The definitions of parallel processing that are more vague and unable to test (I don't know how, but one can just suppose it) are typically adopted by people who hold some sort of axiom of independence that tulpas can do things completely separated from the brain's stream of consciousness associated with the host.
8:58 PM
For example, I have heard from someone that the fact that they doubt or are testing parallel processing would somehow make them incapable of hearing their tulpa try to talk to them and tell them the answer to a problem that they've worked out on their own.
8:59 PM
They somehow weaved together a definition that is rather hard to justify and also almost impossible to test objectively and reach conclusive results from unless such results are positive. No negative results would be possible under their viewpoints.
They have very much intentionally created that answer because it is hard to test, or by nature of evolution have reached that definition, as any person with an alternative one was proven very wrong in argument some time ago
Some list of things to do with your tulpa said 'have a possession fight' over like a hand or somthing. But the problem is, that only works if im not trying my hardest, because then the hand just doesn't move. Like a big and little brother playfighting, as soon as the big one trys to win, its over.
[@Deleted User Well I think it's more of a focus based system. The brain has a certain amount of focus it can spend at any time. And that focus can be associated with an entity who controls/has it. With switching. The fronter would associate with all the focus revolving around the bodies senses but the others can still access it/know it even though they aren't associating with it.]
[Well no. All entities have a set amount of focus at any time they are active. Those in focus have more. Switching just takes the primary consciousness focus and the bodily senses focus and associates to you.]
[The subjective experience is multiple active at once, with a certain amount of strength or focus. If it's actually true that's another matter. If it's not it just means rapid switching of activity making it indistinguishable.]
